Home › Workshops › The Risk in the Answer

PROPOSED WORKSHOP

Build better habits for checking AI-generated work

The proposed workshop The Risk in the Answer focuses on how people examine claims, evidence, assumptions and uncertainty before using AI-generated material at work.

It is intended for non-technical workplace users and does not provide legal, financial, employment, procurement, privacy or other professional advice.

Use Contact to describe the audience and workplace context. This workshop remains proposed; an enquiry does not book a session or take payment.

AI-generated still life: a clipboard and pen, representing human review.
AI-generated concept illustration, not a photograph of workshop delivery.

A polished answer still needs human judgement

AI-generated material can contain claims, recommendations and apparent evidence that require checking before use.

The proposed workshop concentrates on practical questions a workplace user can ask before relying on an answer.

The goal is not automatic distrust or automatic acceptance; it is a visible, proportionate evaluation process.

A proportionate approach

The amount of checking should reflect the context, the available evidence and the consequences of being wrong.

Proposed workshop scope

Identify the claim

Separate an AI-generated claim from the evidence offered to support it.

Inspect the support

Notice missing context, unstated assumptions and unsupported certainty.

Choose what to verify

Decide which claims require independent verification before use.

Match checking to consequence

Compare the consequence of an error with the effort required to check.

Record uncertainty and ownership

Record uncertainty, escalation needs and the person who remains accountable for the decision.

Explain the reasoning

Explain a decision so a colleague or manager can review the reasoning.

How the session is proposed to work

01

Introduce

The facilitator introduces a checking question in plain language.

02

Apply

Participants apply it to a clearly labelled fictional or de-identified workplace example.

03

Compare

The group compares what it accepted, what it questioned and what it would verify.

04

Record

Participants record a checking or escalation step they could adapt to their own work.

Who this proposed workshop is for

It may fit

Teams that use generative AI to draft, summarise, analyse or recommend and need a shared way to discuss checking and escalation.

Non-technical users who need practice examining an answer rather than building or configuring an AI system.

It does not provide

Technical model-safety training, legal advice, financial advice, employment advice, privacy advice, procurement advice or a compliance review.

Certification of a person, validation of an AI system or a guarantee that future AI-generated work will be accurate, safe or suitable.

What to include in your enquiry

Describe the participant roles, typical work and questions you want to examine. A short description is enough for an initial enquiry.

Do not send personal, sensitive, confidential or security-classified information. Example selection and preparation would need agreement before any session.

Details still to be confirmed

This workshop remains proposed. Duration, participant limit, delivery format, preparation, materials, follow-up, price, GST treatment and terms are to be confirmed.

The outline does not confirm a date, capacity or facilitator availability.

Discuss the audience and workplace context

Use Contact to explain who uses AI-generated material, what kinds of work are involved and where checking or escalation is difficult.

An enquiry starts a discussion about fit. It does not confirm workshop availability, reserve a place or take payment.